Appellate Court of Maryland applies the recently adopted Daubert/Steve...

02/01/2023

  Parkway Neuroscience and Spine Institute, LLC v. Katz, Absoch, Windesheim, Gershman & Freedman, P.A., et al., No. 658, September Term, 2021, Opinion by Adkins, J.                 On...

Maryland Court of Appeals Prevents an Injured Firefighter from Double...

09/30/2022

Spevak v. Montgomery Cnty., 2022 Md. LEXIS 323.         Recently, the Maryland Court of Appeals issued an unreported opinion that clarified the standard necessary to apply the offset...

Maryland’s Intermediate Appellate Court Expands Scope of Personal Safe...

09/23/2022

  David P. Bogert, et al. v. Thomas A. Thompson, Jr., et al., No. 1171, Sept. Term, 2021.     Under most circumstances, a plaintiff cannot recover for pain and suffering when the damage...

RSRM Congratulates its Attorneys on their Maryland State Bar Associati...

08/15/2022

  Tara Barnes, Partner – MSBA Judicial Appointments                                                                         Committee Co-Chair John Thompson, Associate – MSBA Young...

The Court of Special Appeals Clarifies Subrogation Rights of Carriers...

08/15/2022

Conley v. Trumbull Ins. Co., No. 0081-2021 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. Jul. 18, 2022)     In a recent unreported opinion by the Court of Special Appeals, a three-judge panel confirmed that the...

Cosa Makes Clear That “Definite Proof” In WCC Hernia Claims Refer To T...

07/29/2022

    The Court of Special Appeals (“COSA”) recently issued a reported opinion discussing the “definite proof” requirement found in Section 9-504 of the Maryland Labor and Employment Article....

Congratulations to Associate Logan Hayes on her recent trial win in th...

07/25/2022

Ms. Hayes successfully defended an aquarium tank company in a product liability case. Plaintiff alleged that his 500-gallon aquarium tank had developed a leak due to a product defect,...

The Supreme Court’s Prescription for the United States: Implications o...

07/11/2022

         Amongst the recent release of controversial opinions, the Supreme Court issued an opinion that opioid “pill mill” doctors cannot be convicted under the Controlled Substances Act (“...

Rollins, Smalkin, Richards & Mackie, L.L.C.

12/31/1969

Pages